Wi-FiGurus

The community of Wi-Fi Professionals

Top Referrer

Gino

Most Profilic Writer

jonassono

Newsletter Subscription
Name:
Email:
Format:
Select:
List:
Most Popular
Latest Content
Tag Cloud
access point configuration hotel India interference InterOp maintainence market multicast Public Wi-Fi reengineering sales security services spectrum analyzer Users Vo-WiFi VoWIP WLAN capacity
802.11a a Viable Alternative PDF Print E-mail
(0 votes)
Written by Jim Geier   
Monday, 02 April 2007
When deciding upon which wireless LAN technology to use, you might be interested in reading my recent article comparing 802.11a and 802.11b/g. The range of 802.11a is better than what many have touted over the past few years. Because of better capacity than either 802.11b or 802.11g, consider 802.11a as a possible alternative when deploying wireless LANs.
Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
Absolutely right
davidb77380 (Registered) 2007-07-16 16:36:02

I agree -- range is not an issue. Anyone who has deployed enough commercial WLANs knows you can rarely run 2.4GHz radios at more than 20mW to keep co-channel interference in check. At that power level, 802.11b or g will have no more (and generally less) range than 11a.

Another 11a advantage that simplifies deployments is the larger number of non-overlapping channels (at least 8 and usually 12-13 depending on the vendor).

Also, because of the greater number of non-overlapping channels, there is virtually no co-channel interference. And because of that, 802.11a smokes b or g in real world environments.
Only registered users can write comments!
 
< Prev   Next >
Home
Top Content
eLearning (Login reqd.)
Quiz
Pod casts
Quick Tips
Tutorials
Columns
Wi-Fi News
WiMax News
Glossary
Book Store
Events
Links
Login
Who's Online
We have 7 guests online
Syndicate
Sponsored Links